Skip to main content

The Evolution of Frontend Development (Why This Slide Still Hit Me)

Concept:
I’ve always worked in a modular, decoupled world — but seeing this architecture slide made me pause. Not because it was new to me, but because it laid out the trajectory of the field in a way that felt clean, inevitable, and honest.

🛠 My Path Was Always Decoupled​

I didn’t come from a world of tightly coupled frontend/backend systems.

  • I learned HTML/CSS/JS early on — hand-coded, raw, exploratory.
  • A few years later I was writing scripts to loop over REST APIs.
  • In school, I was learning OLTP database design.
  • Then my first job was all about OLAP modeling, ETL processes, and data-driven UI.
  • I picked up ADO.NET to work with databases — not via tools or click-through wizards, but with direct, programmatic control.
  • My .NET journey spanned VBA → VB → C#, from CLI tools and WinForms to Unity and modern reactive frontend frameworks.

At no point in that journey did I encounter a “monolithic full-stack.”
Everything was naturally modular, layered, and decoupled — because that’s how I thought.

🧠 Why This Slide Still Hit Me​

Evolution of Frontend Development

Source: Microfrontends Presentation On Youtube

When I first saw this diagram, it didn’t teach me anything new about architecture.
But it did crystallize the industry’s evolution — and how far the frontend had come in terms of responsibility and design.

It laid out something I’d felt all along:

That frontend deserves real architectural thinking — not as an afterthought to the backend, but as a system of its own.

Even though I never went through the Monolith → SOA → Microservices → Micro Frontends transition personally, I appreciated how the slide captured the mindset shift in the field.

🧩 This Slide Mapped the Industry's Growing Awareness​

Each column in the slide reflects more than just technical change — it reflects how teams collaborate, who owns what, and how UI is no longer “just the interface.”

Frontend isn’t just a paint layer anymore — it’s distributed, deployed, observable, and testable.
And this slide captured that journey beautifully.

🧵 Final Thought​

Seeing your own mindset echoed in an architectural diagram is validating.

This slide didn’t reshape how I think — it confirmed what I already knew:

Frontend is not a second-class citizen. It’s infrastructure. It’s owned. It’s modular. It’s designed.

For the record, my backends are still technically “monoliths” — and that’s fine. Microservices and SSR are just tools. What matters is the boundary.

In my mind, fetch/XHR is how you interact with the real backend, regardless of whether you're in React, Vue, or writing vanilla JS. Even on small projects, I naturally write things in a reactive, state-driven way.

SSR? I haven’t leaned into it much — but it doesn’t break decoupling either. To me, it’s just:

  • A backend app running in a container on one port
  • A frontend app running on another port
  • A proxy in front routing:
    • Data requests (e.g. /api) → backend
    • Page loads (e.g. /) → frontend

It’s still decoupled. It’s still modular. It’s just layered differently.

The point isn’t how you break things up — it’s that you respect the separation of concerns no matter what stack you use.